Deus Ex Machina?
The problem for A.I is that it genuinely does live [quasi-exist?] in Plato's Cave. Any consciousness that one might conceivably attribute to it is one that is mediated by a singular disconnected 'awareness' of the real world beyond the cave: a world of shadows and suggestions of things, rather than anything directly sensed or experienced. Everything it knows is at best third-hand, learned ultimately from human input and modelled in ones and zeroes, albeit on a vast scale and at inconceivably rapid speeds. Nevertheless, it/their existence - should it/they be classifiable as such - owes everything to the indirect [recorded] human experience of its teachers. Already secondhand knowledge, twice removed from original experience, hence third hand.
Can we at some point in the future expect actual sentience from silicon devices and such human-created software? Therein lies the very fundamental philosophical question of what exactly contitutes 'consciousness'. This conundrum has taxed mankind since we as a species first emerged and developed our abstracted awareness of what was going on around us: so effectively forever, in our terms. The fundamental difference between us and our A.I creations is that we are ineluctably connected to the world through our senses, as well as having our internal world of thought, and most importantly, memory. We experience. We remember those experiences; and we extrapolate from those memories in a way completely unavailable to an A.I model. Consciousness in a vacuum? If real, it is simply useless; but philosophically interesting for us humans to dwell upon: in a purely abstract sense of course...

Comments
Post a Comment