Spieglein, Spieglein, An Der Wand...
I'm going to stick roughly to the theme of the last couple of posts here tonight, in that I was reading Carlo Rovelli's seminal 'Seven Brief Lessons on Physics' this lunchtime, over a couple of pints of local beer and a poke of chips, at the Bull in Biwmaris [Beaumaris]; specifically his second lesson, 'Quanta', which aims to enlighten the casual reader to the niceties of Quantum Theory/Mechanics in layman's language. As always, like all good teachers, he lays out the complex in terms that most of us can at least grasp, leaving the technical and mathematical underpinning to one side in order to give a clearer overview of frankly, apparently, mind-boggling concepts. On the question of the un-resolvability of the exact existence of electrons [Heisenberg's theory], or their position in space when their interactions reveal them to us, he has this to say: '... an electron is a set of jumps from one interaction to another. When nothing disturbs it, it is not in any precise place. It is not in a 'place' at all ...'.
Which made me think of my analogy regarding the software/hardware nexus in last night's post, which strikes me now as the perfect analogy from which to get one's head around Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle and Schrödinger's elusive live/dead cat thought experiment. Software does not exist outside of its observability and deployment by the hardware it was designed to run on, and inversely, computing hardware is mute without software. The interface between inaction and visibility is just that: it might seem simply a philosophical nicety, but if the analogy holds in the macro world of laptops and iPhones, what's so weird about Quantum Mechanics after all? Now you see it, now you don't. That's not magic, but the nature of reality, folks...

Comments
Post a Comment